When you put your book into the world,
there's always going to be some fear of a bad review.
This is your baby! You've worked for at
least months, probably years, to put this project into the world. If
you're a responsible author, you do fastidious edits and revisions
before presenting your work to the public, which adds even more time.
Then you spend time with your cover, formatting, advertising... you
get it. It's a lot of work!
So when someone writes a critical
review or, God forbid, a negative review, we feel attacked. All the
work that we put in feels not only unappreciated, but utterly
pointless. In my opinion, this is the reason that, regardless of how
we authors steel our wool or emotionally detach ourselves from out
book, critical reviews still hurt. So when I saw this...
“Serializing a work of fiction can be
executed effectively, but, in this instance, it was not. … The
journey could have relieved my feeling of plot-drought, but it did
not come off as onerous in a physical sense or in regard to the
relationships between the characters. Worst of all, Stemler builds
suspense throughout the novel for the Soldier Son fight, but it
doesn't pay off.”
OYE!
My heart!
My soul!
My lungs!
My liver!
No, not really. Though that was
probably my initial reaction. Maybe that initial gut-wrenching
feeling never goes away. But then I took a breath, shrugged, realized
that everyone has books they like and don't like, and my book isn't
perfect. (I've been at this for 5 years now. I know the drill)
Critical reviews are not our enemies as
authors. Critical reviews are not enemies to anyone, actually. The
reviews that really annoy me (and many like me, from my conversations
with other authors) are the ones that say “I didn't like it” and
then don't say why. Those I call “bad” reviews, for more reasons
than one. Critical reviews give us something valuable; an opportunity
to improve. Critical reviews are not easy to hear—it's not easy to
hear what you're not good at—but they are one of the ways we get
better, and no one ever said getting better was supposed to be easy.
On that note, no one ever said your work would be appreciated,
either, or should be. Once I thought about it, I realized that asking
someone to appreciate my work would be like asking someone to
appreciate me living. No one can appreciate your life but you!
This particular review got more more
interesting. I got an email message from the reviewer over twitter
asking about the book. Fascinating! He had a lot of great questions
about the Soldier Sons, about Zensor, about the book's conflict. I
was so glad to see he was interested. However, I did think it was a
little strange he knew so much about the book and was interested
enough to track me down, yet didn't like it.
Zensor is displeased by all this fuckery. |
In any case, it was the best bad review
I ever had. I love answering questions about my works. In fact, it
gave me an idea for a mock interview (which I hope to have more space
for next time). After I answered his questions, I noticed he did
change his review from one star to three stars, which made me very
happy. Three stars is also what I also give books that, though they
didn't have any major flaws, weren't my cup of tea.
Long story short, critical reviews
aren't necessarily bad reviews and good listening is always a good
policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment